According to foreign media, "the Wall Street Journal reported that the legal dispute between Oracle and Google, on
Monday, have a final verdict. Google is determined to exist the patent acts of infringement of Java, but the compensation
has been substantially reduced, is expected to only about $ 100,000 and can not be divided into the profits of Google
Android.
The jury found that Google does use the behavior of the Oracle Java interfaces, but whether this practice is no
The jury found that Google does use the behavior of the Oracle Java interfaces, but whether this practice is no
consensus by the so-called "fair use" protection. cellphone accessories wholesale
In addition, the additional jury found the existence of a small amount of evidence of violations of the Java source code
In addition, the additional jury found the existence of a small amount of evidence of violations of the Java source code
for the Google developed Android system, but the case supervision by a judge, means that Oracle will eventually be only
in accordance with the findings of statutory damages, but not for Google Android profit sharing.
Although the number of compensation is unclear, but in general, not be higher than $ 100,000, which is much lower
Although the number of compensation is unclear, but in general, not be higher than $ 100,000, which is much lower
than previously $ 1 billion is expected to Oracle.
Google's lawyers said that since the jury can not determine the Oracle Java interface has received a "fair use doctrine"
Google's lawyers said that since the jury can not determine the Oracle Java interface has received a "fair use doctrine"
protection, Google will be looking for the characterization of this judgment invalid judgment. A Google spokesman said
in a statement, "We appreciate the efforts of the jury, but you know, fair use and infringement has always been a matter
of both sides."
Oracle's spokesman claimed that the case of evidence to show that Google needs to pay him licensing fees, before "In
Oracle's spokesman claimed that the case of evidence to show that Google needs to pay him licensing fees, before "In
addition to Google and other companies have access to the Java license, and maintain the compatibility of Java.
wholesale cell phone skins
This verdict by a jury in San Francisco a week-long deliberations obtained. The jury discussed mainly concentrated in
This verdict by a jury in San Francisco a week-long deliberations obtained. The jury discussed mainly concentrated in
two parts: copyright protection and to determine the chain reaction that may arise after the Google violated Oracle's
patent prosecution, such as third-party companies such as Google.
Oracle sued Google in August 2010, accusing the latter of alleged infringement of its Java copyright in developing
Oracle sued Google in August 2010, accusing the latter of alleged infringement of its Java copyright in developing
Android. Oracle has said the company believes the Google caused losses of up to $ 1 billion, and wish to seek legal
means to prohibit sales of Google Android product.
Because Android is free to mobile phones and flat-panel manufacturers, Google will soon become the the heavyweights
Because Android is free to mobile phones and flat-panel manufacturers, Google will soon become the the heavyweights
important market for mobile devices. Android has become the world's largest smartphone platform. dropshipping cell
phone accessories
Oracle and Google dispute, some evidence to suggest that Google created the Android platform in 2010 revenue
Oracle and Google dispute, some evidence to suggest that Google created the Android platform in 2010 revenue
valuation of $ 3.7 billion, which includes all with Android, such as music and other content proceeds from the sale.
Google spokesman said that these figures do not reflect the company's business operations.
After the judge announced the verdict, Oracle lawyer said, according to the judgment of infringement of the results, the
After the judge announced the verdict, Oracle lawyer said, according to the judgment of infringement of the results, the
company should be more than their entitlement to statutory compensation, and should be divided into Google's
Android profit.
Judge William Al Tharp, William Alsup of the above has been refuted, that made higher claims of infringement based
Judge William Al Tharp, William Alsup of the above has been refuted, that made higher claims of infringement based
on a small amount of code is "absurd."
No comments:
Post a Comment