August 1 message, according to foreign media reports, Apple's industrial designer, Chris Stringer (Chris Stringer) said on Tuesday that his team for the degree of Samsung and other mobile phone manufacturers to copy the iPhone's innovative behavior angry. leather case for iPad
Stringer said: "We have been fraud, it is very easy to understand" when asked if he recognized the news, August 1, according to foreign media reports, Apple's industrial designers grams Chris Stringer said on Tuesday that his team for Samsung and other handset manufacturers copied the iPhone's innovative behavior of angry.
Stringer said: "We have been fraud, it is very easy to understand" when asked if he to whom fraud, Stringer said, including many mobile phone manufacturers, but the Samsung is particularly serious. "
Stringer had to testify on the Apple design program and the special challenges of the development of iPhone and iPad. iPad leather cases
The Apple designers were the first of the landmark patent litigation witness, after Samsung and Apple are the opening statements. Before opening statements, the Samsung Solicitor John Quinn asked the court to hear more statements, and allow the show to prove evidence of the Samsung F700 mobile phone design as early as the iPhone. Judge Lucy Koh refused the request, said it has heard received three requests to reconsider this motion.
John Quinn to stick to their application, said request the court to listen to more presentations, when he 30 years of litigation career never done. smart case for iPad 2
Judge Gao Lan Hui said: "We have your request written down. Please do not let me punish you."
The court refused to certify the first generation iPhone design from Sony, Samsung has decided that such evidence to the public, the company issued the following statement:
The judge excluded the evidence of independent creation, means that despite Apple be allowed to inaccurately copied to the jury statements F700 iPhone, but Samsung but can not the whole story is told the jury, and demonstrate some of the design before the iPhone launch and Samsung in 2006 development of other mobile phones. These were excluded from the evidence should enable the court to believe that Samsung is not copying the iPhone. The basic principle of fairness requires the jury to decide on all the evidence the facts of the case. Whom fraud, Stringer said, including many mobile phone manufacturers, but the Samsung is particularly serious. "leather cases for iPad2
Stringer had to testify on the Apple design program and the special challenges of the development of iPhone and iPad.
Stringer said: "We have been fraud, it is very easy to understand" when asked if he recognized the news, August 1, according to foreign media reports, Apple's industrial designers grams Chris Stringer said on Tuesday that his team for Samsung and other handset manufacturers copied the iPhone's innovative behavior of angry.
Stringer said: "We have been fraud, it is very easy to understand" when asked if he to whom fraud, Stringer said, including many mobile phone manufacturers, but the Samsung is particularly serious. "
Stringer had to testify on the Apple design program and the special challenges of the development of iPhone and iPad. iPad leather cases
The Apple designers were the first of the landmark patent litigation witness, after Samsung and Apple are the opening statements. Before opening statements, the Samsung Solicitor John Quinn asked the court to hear more statements, and allow the show to prove evidence of the Samsung F700 mobile phone design as early as the iPhone. Judge Lucy Koh refused the request, said it has heard received three requests to reconsider this motion.
John Quinn to stick to their application, said request the court to listen to more presentations, when he 30 years of litigation career never done. smart case for iPad 2
Judge Gao Lan Hui said: "We have your request written down. Please do not let me punish you."
The court refused to certify the first generation iPhone design from Sony, Samsung has decided that such evidence to the public, the company issued the following statement:
The judge excluded the evidence of independent creation, means that despite Apple be allowed to inaccurately copied to the jury statements F700 iPhone, but Samsung but can not the whole story is told the jury, and demonstrate some of the design before the iPhone launch and Samsung in 2006 development of other mobile phones. These were excluded from the evidence should enable the court to believe that Samsung is not copying the iPhone. The basic principle of fairness requires the jury to decide on all the evidence the facts of the case. Whom fraud, Stringer said, including many mobile phone manufacturers, but the Samsung is particularly serious. "leather cases for iPad2
Stringer had to testify on the Apple design program and the special challenges of the development of iPhone and iPad.
No comments:
Post a Comment