December twenty days news, according to media reports, apple has to samsung electronics put forward higher amount of the claim, and now are waiting for the judge's decision. Before this, the court apple still put forward a ban on samsung and product sales in the United States ban application, but was overruled by the judge.
The United States district court judge Lucy Koh in December 17 judgment that apple cannot prove that samsung product of Samsung i9300 case consumer demand is through it is stealing technology push. Although the jury found samsung violated apple 6 patents, but samsung banned in the United States to sell their products to consumers is adverse, for infringing products just samsung mobile phone part.
The jury on August 24, come to the conclusion that samsung to apple should pay a $1.05 billion loss compensation. Apple for the amount of damages the judge will increase by $536 million, and that the amount of damages is samsung should be reduced more than $600 million. Lucy high judge on December 6, held a hearing, but have not yet make decision Samsung i9300 case .
Yankee group analyst Carl Howe in a phone interview said: "the two companies a patent dispute between could not accomplish in one move to a certain party completely killed by banning. If that is the case, then that would belong to one-sidedness form of completely killed. This will be a lasting money war."
Samsung and apple is currently the world's largest two intelligent mobile phone manufacturer, the two sides in more than ten countries on patent wars, so far all have a point. The two companies played the patent wars purpose is to fight for global mobile equipment market leadership. Yankee group estimates that global mobile device the size of the market this year will be 346 billion dollars.
Samsung yesterday announced that it will be in Europe for cancellation of apple products -- appeal. The personage inside course of study thinks, samsung this behavior contributes to the two companies to reconciliation global patent litigation direction.
Washington Dow Lohnes patent lawyer David Long said: "the two companies will reach some form of settlement, a party may pay the other party a certain of money."
No comments:
Post a Comment